Product type
CPSC recalls involving bicycle, skating, and other recreational protective helmets.
90 official CPSC notices published 1995–2026, matched on the notice's product identity — not on description text.
Totals add up the figures the notices state, counting a reannounced recall once; 87 of 90 notices add a unit count. A notice that gives no number adds nothing.
Every model number named in a helmet recall, grouped by notice. Type the number from your product label.
65 model numbers
5Color Children’s Bike Helmet and Pads Sets · 26-789 · 2026
Basecamp Bike Helmets · 26-785 · 2026
Gudook Adult Bike Helmets · 26-528 · 2026
Aisstxoer Adult Bike Helmets · 26-335 · 2026
BBWOO Baby Loungers · 26-185 · 2026
Bell Sports Bicycle Helmets · 25-359 · 2025
Wemfg Children's Multi-Purpose Bike Helmets · 25-088 · 2025
Korimefa Multi-Purpose Bike Helmets · 24-232 · 2024
Chau River Sports Outdoors Kid's Bike Helmets · 24-211 · 2024
Bell Soquel Youth Helmets · 24-118 · 2024
Bell Slope Adult Helmets · 24-074 · 2024
Bell Sports Giro Merit Bicycle Helmets · 23-216 · 2023
Lucky Global Lelinta Multi-Purpose Kids Helmets · 23-747 · 2023
Adult Bike Helmets · 23-741 · 2023
HKSM MACAO Commercial Offshore Lazer bicycle helmets · 19-021 · 2018
Strategic Sports Rollerblade® helmets · 18-751 · 2018
Strategic Sports Bicycle helmets · 18-125 · 2018
Rollerblade inline skating helmets · 16-142 · 2016
Back Trails Jr. Toddler · 05-252 · 2005
PTI Sports Schwinn-brand Toddler Bicycle Helmets · 04-199 · 2004
The helmets in the recalled sets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation, retention system, positional stability, labeling and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
HK Tongyang Technology Co., Ltd., dba Tongyang Cycling
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation, positional stability and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury. In addition, the helmets have a button cell battery that does not bear the warning labels required by Reese's Law. If button cell or coin batteries are swallowed, the ingested batteries can cause serious injuries, including internal chemical burns, and death.
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the retention system, positional stability and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
The cups and containers violate the mandatory standard for consumer products with button cell and coin batteries because they contain button cell batteries that can be accessed easily by children, posing an ingestion hazard. In addition, the products do not bear the warning labels required by Reese's Law. If button cell or coin batteries are swallowed, the ingested batteries can cause serious injuries, including internal chemical burns, and death.
Dongguanshizhouhedianzishangwuyouxiangongsi (Dongguan Zhouhe E-commerce Co., Ltd.) dba Gudook Outdoor Sports
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Shenzhenshilingkexunkeji Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen Lingkexun Technology Co., Ltd.), dba Foubeaka and Geniuss
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the positional stability and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Shenzhen Favoto Co., Ltd., doing business as Favoto
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because they do not comply with the positional stability, labeling and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Shenzhenshiyongxintaidianziyouxiangongsi (Shenzhen Yongxintai Electronics Co., Ltd.), dba, Yxtdz Store
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation, positional stability, and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation, positional stability, labeling and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the retention system and positional stability requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Shenzhenshilonghuaqujialebeibaihuoshanghang (Jialebei Department Store, Longhua District, Shenzhen) dba Samit Outdoor
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the positional stability and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Jinjiangshi XunMai Network Technology Co., Ltd., dba Semfri
The recalled helmets violate the mandatory safety standard for bicycle helmets because the helmets do not comply with the impact attenuation, positional stability, labeling and certification requirements. The helmets can fail to protect the user in the event of a crash, posing a serious risk of injury or death due to head injury.
Every notice, newest first. Unit counts are the U.S. figures each notice states.
As of October 1, 2026, CPSC has published 90 recall notices for helmets since 1995, covering at least 2.7 million units. The most recent is “5Color Recalls Children’s Bicycle Helmet and Pads Sets Due to Risk of Serious Injury or Death from Head Injury; Violate Mandatory Standard for Bicycle Helmets” (CPSC 26-789), announced September 24, 2026.
Yes. As of October 1, 2026, CPSC has published 14 recall notices for helmets in 2026, the most recent on September 24, 2026 (CPSC 26-789).
“Under Armour Recalls Chin Straps for Football Helmets Due to Laceration Hazard” (CPSC 12-035), announced November 3, 2011: about 541,000 units.
Brands named most often: Bell Sports (5), Sakar International (3), Strategic Sports (3), Rawlings Sporting Goods (2), Easton Sports, English Riding Supply, Head and Louis Garneau, plus 73 more brands. Brand-name products are often made by another firm, so one recall can span several brands.
Find the model number on the product's rating label, then type it into the model-number lookup on this page. A match means the number appears in an official CPSC notice; open that notice to confirm any date codes or serial ranges it lists. No match is not proof that a product is safe.
Follow the remedy in the official notice and contact the firm it names. Across helmet recalls, the remedies offered most often are refund (60), replacement (19) and repair (2).
